Exposing Archbishop Georgios: A Dangerous Abuse of the Pulpit in Cyprus

Introduction: Addressing the Archbishop's Assertions

In his recent Easter message, Archbishop Georgios of the Church of Cyprus delivered a pointed critique of Türkiye's role in the ongoing Cyprus issue. As reported by the Cyprus Mail on April 19, 2025, the Archbishop accused Türkiye of manipulating the international community and employing "devious tactics" to further its interests in Cyprus. He stated:

"Turkey has managed to lure us into seeing the solution of our problem from its own angle and perspective. Taking advantage of the reluctance, perhaps, and inability of the UN to exert on Turkey for a just and viable solution to the Cyprus problem and its tactic of keeping equal distances between victim and aggressor, Turkey constantly poses new demands."

This narrative, steeped in historical grievances and nationalistic fervor, dangerously oversimplifies a deeply complex geopolitical issue. Archbishop Georgios, through his politically charged Easter message, has chosen to abandon the neutrality expected of a spiritual leader and instead champion a narrative that vilifies one side while ignoring the legitimate concerns of the other. Such rhetoric is not only divisive but also intellectually dishonest, especially when it dismisses the aspirations of the Turkish Cypriot people, who continue to endure international isolation. Rather than serve as a beacon for reconciliation, the Archbishop’s public position undermines efforts toward a fair and inclusive resolution. It is imperative to approach this matter with a balanced perspective, one grounded in contemporary realities, respect for all communities, and a commitment to lasting peace.

Understanding the Dangers of Church-State Interference in Cyprus

The unchecked interference of religious authority in state matters has repeatedly destabilized Cyprus, and Archbishop Georgios’ inflammatory rhetoric is a grim echo of Archbishop Makarios’ legacy. History has shown that when clerics occupy political space, as Makarios did under the guise of spiritual leadership, the results are divisive and dangerous. The Archbishop’s recent remarks are not only irresponsible but also inflame tensions in a region that desperately needs reconciliation, not dogma. Such pulpit-driven provocations hinder progress, marginalize the Turkish Cypriot voice, and weaponize religion to obstruct diplomacy and peace.

TCE Podcast

Listen below to the TCE Podcast on the topic in more detail.

Weaponising the Cloth: The Church’s Meddling in Political Sovereignty

The politicisation of Cyprus by the Greek Orthodox Church has proven to be one of the most destabilising forces on the island. Under the guise of spiritual guidance, figures like Archbishop Makarios turned the pulpit into a political platform, fuelling nationalist agendas that exacerbated division and conflict. Notably, Makarios' dual role as Archbishop and President led to the 1972–1973 ecclesiastical coup attempt, where three bishops within his own Church sought to defrock him for violating Church canons by holding secular office. This historic rupture, backed indirectly by the Greek military junta and shadow figures like EOKA's George Grivas, highlights the inherent danger of blurred lines between religion and state.

Rejecting Theocracy: Why Cyprus Must Embrace Secular Solutions

The impasse in Cyprus is no longer merely a political matter, it is increasingly being weaponised by religious figures who should know better. Archbishop Georgios' remarks are not isolated, they are a continuation of a legacy that saw Archbishop Makarios defy his own synod to retain power, leading to defrocking attempts and institutional chaos between 1972 and 1973. This crisis, well-documented in ecclesiastical and political history, exposed the fragility of national governance when tied to religious leadership. As Cypriot political analyst Marios Demetriou observed, "When a cleric holds both the crucifix and the constitution, division is inevitable." As long as clerics like Georgios insist on defining geopolitical realities through a pulpit, no constructive dialogue can flourish. A modern and inclusive Cyprus requires a clean separation of church and state, where governance is based on law and mutual recognition, not sermons and sacraments.

TCE Conclusion

The Cyprus issue remains one of the most enduring conflicts in the region. Achieving a just and lasting resolution requires moving beyond entrenched narratives and embracing a balanced approach that respects the rights and aspirations of both communities. Türkiye's involvement, rooted in historical agreements and contemporary realities, should be viewed as part of a broader effort to facilitate peace and stability. It is incumbent upon all parties to engage in sincere, inclusive, and forward-looking dialogue to chart a path toward reconciliation and coexistence.