The political landscape in the Republic of Cyprus is marred by the enduring presence of nationalist ideologies, specifically through parties like AKEL and ELAM, which support the notion of Enosis—the unification of Cyprus with Greece. This ideological stance, deeply embedded in these parties, renders the prospect of a unified federal Cyprus not only implausible but undesirable.

Nationalist Ideologies and Political Dynamics

AKEL, historically a communist party, has shown tendencies that align with Enosis, reflecting a complex interplay between leftist ideology and nationalist aspirations. This alignment suggests a contradiction in their political stance, as they ostensibly support reunification efforts but underpin their politics with an ideology that ultimately seeks union with another sovereign state.

ELAM, more overtly, is an ultra-nationalist group with direct ideological and historical ties to Greece's Golden Dawn—a party known for its extreme right-wing positions and xenophobic rhetoric. The presence and influence of ELAM in Cypriot politics is particularly alarming due to its aggressive nationalism, which has roots in a history of violence and extremism.

Dangers of Entrenched Nationalism

The ideological roots of these parties in extremist movements pose a significant threat to the safety and stability of Turkish Cypriots. The historical offshoots of such ideologies have led to violence and unrest in Cyprus and Greece, demonstrating the dangerous potential of these movements to destabilize society and incite intercommunal conflict.

Geopolitical Realities and the Case for Separation

Given the geopolitical complexities of the Eastern Mediterranean, the entrenchment of nationalist parties in Cyprus's political framework exacerbates regional tensions. These parties' rigid positions against a genuinely inclusive and equitable federal solution underscore the impracticality of attempting to forge a united Cyprus under a federal structure.

Why Two Separate States Are Necessary

The historical context of intercommunal violence, the failure of numerous reunification attempts, and the current political climate underscore the necessity of establishing two sovereign states. A two-state solution respects the distinct identities, aspirations, and security needs of both communities. It provides a clear, stable framework for coexistence, without the constant threat of domination or assimilation posed by nationalist ideologies.

Living together under a single state structure is no longer a viable option for Turkish Cypriots, given the persistent advocacy for Enosis by significant Greek Cypriot political factions and the historical consequences of such ideologies. A two-state solution is not only conducive to peace but essential for the long-term stability and prosperity of both communities on the island.

In conclusion, the presence of nationalist movements within the Republic of Cyprus, particularly those with ties to extreme ideologies like those of Golden Dawn, further cements the argument against a unified federal state. The advocacy for a two-state solution is a rational response to the deep-seated divisions and the historical and ongoing threats posed by such groups. This approach promises a more peaceful, stable, and mutually respectful coexistence for Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots, recognizing their unique identities and sovereign rights.