The ongoing debate about the reunification of Cyprus has reached a critical juncture. Recent discussions, including the article "Is Reunification Too Big a Risk to Take?" published by Cyprus Mail, highlight an increasing recognition that reunification is not only impractical but also potentially destabilizing for Turkish Cypriots.

This perspective has grown stronger over the years, emphasizing the need for Turkish Cypriot autonomy and self-determination.

Historical Context and Turkish Cypriot Persistence

The Turkish Cypriot community has shown remarkable resilience and a firm commitment to self-governance. The hardships faced by Turkish Cypriots began in 1963, following the Enosis movement and EOKA's push for union with Greece. This period marked the start of significant violence against Turkish Cypriots, which many in the community view as attempts at ethnic cleansing and genocide. These actions led to the ousting of Turkish Cypriots from the government and created a climate of fear and insecurity. The situation escalated further in 1974 when Türkiye intervened in response to a Greek-backed coup aimed at uniting Cyprus with Greece, (Enosis) resulting in an end to hostilities towards Turkish Cypriots.

Since then, Turkish Cypriots have developed a self-sustaining society in Northern Cyprus. Despite facing international non-recognition, the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) has built a robust administrative framework, advanced its economy, and fostered a distinct cultural identity. Historically, Turkish Cypriots have experienced significant hardships, including violence, ethnic cleansing and displacement, which have fortified their resolve for autonomy, viewing it not merely as a political stance but as a critical safeguard for their security and identity.

The Risks of Reunification

Reunification presents several significant risks. The political systems and governance styles of Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots have diverged substantially. Integrating these systems could lead to political instability and inefficiency, threatening the progress made by both communities. The breakdown of negotiations in 2017 underscored the deep-seated differences and the impracticality of a unified governance structure.

Economically, the disparities between the north and the south are stark. While the Greek Cypriot south has benefited from European Union membership, the Turkish Cypriot north has developed its economy under restrictive conditions. Reunification could exacerbate economic inequalities, leading to tensions and potential economic disruption. The European Commission has noted that despite EU assistance, the economic gap remains significant.

The Right to Self-Determination

The right to self-determination is enshrined in international law and is a cornerstone of the Turkish Cypriot position. Decades of self-reliance have solidified the desire for autonomy among Turkish Cypriots. This desire is not a transient political stance but a deeply rooted aspiration based on historical and contemporary experiences. The international community must recognize and respect this pursuit of self-determination.

Greek Cypriot leaders and the broader Greek Cypriot community must also come to terms with this reality. The notion of a united Cyprus, while idealistic to some Greek Cypriots, overlooks the complex and painful history that has shaped the current divide. Recognizing the TRNC's autonomy does not preclude cooperation or peaceful coexistence; instead, it can pave the way for a more pragmatic and stable relationship between the two communities.

Moving Forward: A New Paradigm

Rather than pursuing the increasingly untenable goal of reunification, both communities should focus on fostering collaboration and mutual respect. Confidence-building measures, economic cooperation, and cultural exchanges can help bridge gaps without forcing an artificial political union. This approach allows for the recognition of the TRNC's autonomy while promoting peace and stability on the island.

The Greek Cypriot leadership must acknowledge that the Turkish Cypriot quest for self-determination is a legitimate aspiration. This recognition can lead to more constructive dialogues and mutually beneficial agreements. The international community, particularly the European Union and the United Nations, should facilitate such dialogues, ensuring that both communities' rights and aspirations are respected.

TCE Conclusion

The question posed by the Cyprus Mail—whether reunification is too big a risk to take—has a clear answer from the Turkish Cypriot perspective. Reunification presents significant risks and overlooks the legitimate aspirations of the Turkish Cypriot people. Autonomy and self-determination have become essential components of the Turkish Cypriot identity and political reality. It is time for the Greek Cypriot community and the international community to recognize this and support a future where both communities can coexist peacefully, respecting each other's sovereignty and right to self-governance.

By acknowledging and supporting the Turkish Cypriot pursuit of self-determination, a more stable and cooperative future can be achieved for all of Cyprus.