support the movement
President Tatar's Reassessment of UN Security Council Resolution 186
In a recent address marking the anniversary of United Nations Security Council Resolution 186, President Ersin Tatar of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) offered a critical analysis of the resolution's historical context and its enduring impact on Turkish Cypriots.
He emphasized that the resolution, adopted in 1964, effectively disregarded the constitutional rights of the Turkish Cypriot community, leading to a protracted period of political marginalization.
Historical Context: The Genesis of Resolution 186
Resolution 186 was passed amidst escalating intercommunal violence in Cyprus during the early 1960s. Intended to address the deteriorating situation, the resolution recommended the establishment of a UN Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP) to prevent further conflict and maintain law and order. However, President Tatar argues that the resolution inadvertently legitimized the Greek Cypriot administration while sidelining the Turkish Cypriot community, thereby undermining the bi-communal foundation of the 1960 Constitution.
President Tatar's Critique: Ignored Constitutional Rights
In his assessment, President Tatar highlighted that Resolution 186 failed to acknowledge the constitutional breakdown precipitated by the Greek Cypriot leadership's attempts to amend the constitution unilaterally. These amendments aimed to diminish the political power and rights of Turkish Cypriots, contravening the agreements that established the Republic of Cyprus as a partnership state. By recognizing the Greek Cypriot administration as the sole legitimate government, the resolution effectively ignored the constitutional rights of Turkish Cypriots, leading to their exclusion from governance and international representation.
Implications for Turkish Cypriots: A Legacy of Marginalization
The adoption of Resolution 186 had profound implications for the Turkish Cypriot community:
- Political Exclusion: The resolution's recognition of the Greek Cypriot administration marginalized Turkish Cypriots from political processes, resulting in a lack of representation in international forums and decision-making bodies.
- Security Concerns: The absence of adequate recognition and protection mechanisms left Turkish Cypriots vulnerable to aggression, necessitating self-defense measures and fostering a climate of insecurity.
- Economic Isolation: The political non-recognition led to economic embargoes and isolation, hindering the economic development and prosperity of the Turkish Cypriot community.
The Path Forward: Advocating for Recognition and Rights
President Tatar's reflections serve as a call to the international community to reassess historical resolutions and their long-term impacts. He advocates for:
- Equal Recognition: Acknowledging the TRNC as a sovereign entity to ensure Turkish Cypriots have equal footing in negotiations and international relations.
- Restoration of Rights: Addressing past injustices by restoring the political and constitutional rights of Turkish Cypriots as originally envisioned in the 1960 agreements.
- Constructive Dialogue: Engaging in sincere and result-oriented negotiations that respect the rights and aspirations of both communities on the island.
TCE Conclusion
President Tatar's critique of UN Security Council Resolution 186 underscores the necessity for a nuanced understanding of Cyprus's historical and political landscape. The resolution's failure to protect Turkish Cypriots' constitutional rights has had lasting adverse effects. Addressing these historical grievances is crucial for achieving a just and sustainable solution to the Cyprus issue, ensuring that the rights and identities of all communities are respected and upheld.
References
President Tatar assesses UN Security Council Resolution 186 on its anniversary: 'Our constitutional rights were ignored.' Presidency of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.