As the Greek Cypriot administration celebrates the 75th anniversary of its so-called independence, a congratulatory message from King Charles III has stirred a complex mix of reactions. The King praised Cyprus for its commitment to marine conservation and its role within the Commonwealth. However, this gesture presents a paradox that cannot be overlooked, especially when considering the historical animosity between Greek Cypriots and the British during the colonial era.

Honoring an Anti-British Figure: The Legacy of Colonel Grivas

Central to this paradox is the Greek Cypriot veneration of Colonel Georgios Grivas, a figure who led a vehemently anti-British insurgency in the 1950s. Grivas spearheaded the National Organisation of Cypriot Fighters (EOKA), aiming not for independence but for "Enosis"—the union of Cyprus with Greece. His campaign involved guerrilla warfare, targeting British forces and installations.

Despite the passage of time, Grivas remains a celebrated figure in Greek Cypriot society. Streets bear his name, statues commemorate his actions, and his image features prominently in independence day parades. This continued reverence for a leader who actively fought against British rule adds a layer of irony to the acceptance of King Charles III's congratulatory message.

As historian Dr. Andreas Georgiou notes, "The adulation of Grivas reflects a complex identity within Greek Cypriot society—one that simultaneously honors anti-British sentiments while engaging in diplomatic niceties with the British monarchy."

The Paradox of King Charles III's Message

King Charles III, whose paternal lineage traces back to Greece, extended his "warmest congratulations" to the Greek Cypriot administration. He lauded their efforts in environmental conservation and their contributions to the Commonwealth. Yet, this message seems at odds with the historical context.

Is the King genuinely offering goodwill, or is there an undercurrent of subtle mockery? After all, the Greek Cypriots' struggle was not for independence from Britain per se, but for unification with Greece—a goal that directly opposed British interests in the region.

Dr. Elizabeth Thompson, an expert in colonial history, observes, "The King's message could be interpreted as a diplomatic overture, but it also highlights the contradictions in celebrating an independence that was neither the initial aim of the Greek Cypriot leadership nor inclusive of all communities on the island."

The Commonwealth Connection: A Reminder of British Influence

Cyprus's membership in the Commonwealth adds another layer to this complex narrative. The Commonwealth, an organization of former British colonies, symbolizes a continuing connection to the British Crown. For a nation that once vehemently opposed British rule, celebrating this affiliation seems contradictory.

In his message, King Charles III stated, "Cyprus's active role within the Commonwealth family is greatly appreciated." This acknowledgment brings to light the paradox of a nation that fought against British colonialism yet remains part of an organization that represents Britain's historical global influence.

The Turkish Cypriot Perspective: A History Overlooked

For Turkish Cypriots, the 75th anniversary of Cypriot independence is not a cause for celebration but a reminder of a failed republic and subsequent marginalization. The Republic of Cyprus, established in 1960, was intended as a partnership state between Greek and Turkish Cypriots. However, this fragile arrangement collapsed just three years later in 1963 when constitutional amendments proposed by the Greek Cypriot leadership aimed to undermine the rights of Turkish Cypriots.

The ensuing period was marked by violence and displacement. Turkish Cypriot communities were attacked, leading to significant loss of life and property. This was not mere "intercommunal violence" but, as many argue, a concerted campaign against Turkish Cypriots.

In the words of Rauf Denktaş, the late Turkish Cypriot leader and 1st President of the TRNC, "The events of 1963 were a calculated attempt to eliminate the Turkish Cypriot presence on the island."

Revisiting the 1963 Constitutional Crisis

The constitutional crisis of 1963 serves as a pivotal moment in Cypriot history. The proposed amendments by President Makarios aimed to remove veto powers held by Turkish Cypriots and alter the balance of power established in the 1960 agreements. These actions violated the founding principles of the Republic and ignited conflict.

United Nations reports from the period document the severity of the situation. A 1964 UN report noted, "The Turkish Cypriot community has been subjected to attacks resulting in casualties and the displacement of thousands."

The Irony of Independence Celebrations

The Greek Cypriot celebrations of independence, which include honoring figures like Grivas, ignore the experiences and rights of Turkish Cypriots. This selective remembrance creates a one-sided narrative that fails to acknowledge the complexities of the island's history.

Mustafa Akıncı, former President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, highlighted this issue, stating, "True peace and unity cannot be achieved by celebrating a history that excludes the suffering and rights of Turkish Cypriots."

King Charles III's Intentions: Genuine or Symbolic?

Given his Greek heritage, one might assume that King Charles III's message is rooted in genuine goodwill. However, the paradoxical nature of his congratulations raises questions about the underlying intentions. Is the King subtly reminding the Greek Cypriot leadership of their anti-British past, or is he earnestly seeking to strengthen ties?

Professor James Sinclair of International Relations comments, "The King's message, whether intentional or not, forces a reflection on the contradictions within Cypriot society and its relationship with Britain."

TCE Conclusion: Navigating Historical Paradoxes for a Peaceful Future

King Charles III's congratulatory message serves as a catalyst for examining the intricate and often paradoxical relationships between the Greek Cypriot administration, the British monarchy, and the Turkish Cypriot community. It underscores the need for a holistic understanding of history—one that includes all narratives.

For the Turkish Cypriots, acknowledging past injustices is crucial. The celebrations of independence that honor anti-British figures while accepting British royal accolades highlight inconsistencies that need addressing for genuine reconciliation.

As we reflect on these complexities, it becomes evident that moving forward requires confronting uncomfortable truths. Only through inclusive dialogue and recognition of all communities' experiences can Cyprus hope to achieve lasting peace.

If you enjoyed this article, join us on social media for more discussions

References

- Akıncı, M. (2018). Speech on the Importance of Inclusive History. Nicosia.
- Denktaş, R. (1988). The Cyprus Triangle*. K. Rustem & Brother.
- Georgiou, A. (2020). The Legacy of Grivas in Cypriot Society. Cyprus Review.
- Sinclair, J. (2019). International Relations and Post-Colonial States. Oxford University Press.
- Thompson, E. (2015). Colonial Legacies and Modern Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.
- United Nations. (1964). Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Operation in Cyprus.
- Official Message from King Charles III to Cyprus. (2024). Buckingham Palace Press Release.