The article “How Impartial Can the UN in Cyprus Really Be?” published in Cyprus Mail by Fahri Zihni, a prominent Turkish Cypriot activist and former chair of the Council of Turkish Cypriot Associations (UK), offers a pointed critique of the United Nations' role and impartiality in Cyprus.

Zihni’s insights highlight the complexities and perceived biases that challenge the UN's peacekeeping and mediation efforts on the island.

Funding and Influence

One of the critical points Zihni raises is the unique funding arrangement for the UN peacekeeping mission in Cyprus. Unlike typical UN missions funded by the organization's member states, the Cyprus operation relies significantly on contributions from Cyprus and Greece. This funding model, according to Zihni, creates an inherent conflict of interest, potentially skewing the UN's actions and decisions towards the preferences of the Greek Cypriot administration. This perception undermines the trust that Turkish Cypriots have in the UN's ability to act as a neutral mediator.

Lack of Formal Agreement with Northern Cyprus

The absence of a formal agreement between the UN and northern Cyprus is another significant issue. Zihni argues that this omission exacerbates the mistrust among Turkish Cypriots, who feel marginalized and inadequately represented in negotiations and peacekeeping efforts. The UN's mandate and operations are perceived as being disproportionately influenced by the Greek Cypriot side, further eroding confidence in the peace process.

Historical Context and Bias

Zihni also provides a historical perspective, emphasizing long-standing grievances of the Turkish Cypriot community. He recounts the social and economic embargoes imposed on Turkish Cypriots since the 1960s, which have had lasting detrimental effects on their socio-economic conditions. These embargoes, according to Zihni, were part of a broader strategy by successive Greek Cypriot administrations to isolate and economically pressure the Turkish Cypriot community, contributing to a deep-seated mistrust of both the Greek Cypriot government and international organizations perceived to be complicit or biased.

UN Envoy’s Role and Actions

Criticism is also directed at the actions of the current UN envoy, who Zihni suggests has not adequately addressed the concerns of the Turkish Cypriot community. The envoy’s approach is viewed as lacking in genuine efforts to foster equitable dialogue and trust-building measures. Instead, Zihni contends that the envoy’s actions have reinforced the status quo, failing to challenge the underlying biases and systemic issues that perpetuate division and mistrust.

Recommendations for Moving Forward

Zihni calls for a reassessment of the UN's role and strategies in Cyprus. He advocates for a more balanced and inclusive approach that genuinely addresses the concerns of both communities. This includes revisiting the funding arrangements and establishing formal agreements with all parties involved. Additionally, Zihni stresses the importance of confidence-building measures that are perceived as fair and impartial by both Greek and Turkish Cypriots.

The Broader Implications

The issues raised by Zihni have broader implications for peacekeeping and international mediation efforts globally. They underscore the importance of transparency, equity, and inclusivity in international interventions. The case of Cyprus illustrates how perceived biases and unequal treatment can undermine peace processes and entrench divisions. For international organizations like the UN, ensuring impartiality and addressing the concerns of all stakeholders are crucial for maintaining credibility and effectiveness in conflict resolution.

Conclusion

The article by Fahri Zihni offers a critical lens on the UN's impartiality in Cyprus, highlighting the need for more balanced and transparent approaches to peacekeeping and mediation. His perspectives underscore the deep-rooted challenges and mistrust that continue to hinder the peace process on the island. 

Fahri Zihni's extensive work and commentary on Cyprus emphasize the need for addressing historical grievances and creating a more equitable framework for negotiations. His objective views, rooted in a deep understanding of the region's history and current dynamics, offer valuable insights for anyone interested in the ongoing conflict and the search for lasting peace in Cyprus.

For a more comprehensive understanding, readers are encouraged to explore Zihni's detailed arguments and historical insights in the original article available on Cyprus Mail.