support the movement
As the Greek Cypriot administration celebrates the 75th anniversary of its so-called independence, a congratulatory message from King Charles III has stirred a complex mix of reactions. The King praised Cyprus for its commitment to marine conservation and its role within the Commonwealth. However, this gesture presents a paradox that cannot be overlooked, especially when considering the historical animosity between Greek Cypriots and the British during the colonial era.
Turkish and Greek Cypriots are set to meet in October under the auspices of the United Nations, in what many see as a crucial attempt to break the deadlock over Cyprus's future. This informal dialogue comes as both sides remain committed to discussing a way forward, albeit from deeply entrenched positions. The UN has stepped in once again to mediate, seeking to establish a new momentum for meaningful negotiations. Turkish Cypriots, represented by President Ersin Tatar, continue to advocate for a two-state solution based on sovereign equality, while the Greek Cypriot side insists on a bi-zonal, bi-communal federation.
Northern Cyprus, led by the determined leadership of President Ersin Tatar, is making waves in the diplomatic community by actively seeking direct flights from Russia to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). In an ambitious bid to enhance the international status of the TRNC, President Tatar's efforts could break the longstanding isolation faced by the Turkish Cypriot people and inject much-needed vitality into their economy.
Recent reporting by Democracy for Sale has brought serious allegations against the Freedom & Fairness movement and its affiliated lobbying practices. According to the article, “Five British politicians have been accused of breaching lobbying rules by asking parliamentary questions about the self-declared Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus after taking all-expenses-paid trips to the breakaway territory” (Democracy for Sale). These all-expenses-paid trips, organized by those linked to the Freedom & Fairness movement, are now under scrutiny for potentially violating the ethical boundaries of lobbying in the UK Parliament. Such accusations call into question the integrity of the advocacy linked to Northern Cyprus, creating a perception that these efforts were aimed at gaining undue influence rather than representing the true needs of Turkish Cypriots.